Tuesday, April 14, 2009

Have we missed the boat and are stuck up on the wrong side of the bank?

Hey folks,
I know it has been a loooooooooooooooong time since I have posted anything on this blog and since we have had some good discussions.
I am now posting what I have posted on my personal blog. and would like you guys to add to this thought of mine with your own observations and instances and debate on the question raised. Hoping for another fruitful discussion!

I was part of a team visiting some villages near Mumbai to understand how people with low literacy levels use their mobile phones in day to day life. We were specifically there to understand how they do ‘save’ the contact details of their friends and families and we were in for some surprise. Of course, we did expect that they would keep a physical diary or notebook around them to write down the contacts as we do come across people using this model fairly frequently. But we came across some instances where people used some really interesting ways to beat the problems that the current phone models posed for low literacy and different language skills. For instance, there was this one person, who had saved a four digit number in place of his friend’s name along with his phone number. It turned out that in his circle of friends only one guy owned a motorbike and as it was easier for the person to type number than the alphabets in his phone, he saved his friends contact number under this unique vehicle number! While some of them asked their more educated friends to save their numbers in the phone, one plumber used the missed call list along with the last 5 digits of the phone number to manage his current clients.

Then there was this other time, when coming back from a long trip, my parents and I took a coffee break in a small town. There was a political rally in that town and the restaurant was full of people with some ‘political connection.’ A particular loud mouth was sitting just behind me and my mom and was shouting in his phone trying to give directions to the guy on the other end, which irritated my mom and I had to give him some piece of my mind. But then the situation was deftly and diplomatically handled by my parents to avoid me getting beaten up by the three thugs. This incident made me think, why we shout on the phone when the other person is not able to hear us, as it doesn’t matter how much we shout, it all depends on the network strength! I feel we really don’t realize that the voice quality over the phone is network dependent and behave as we would behave when talking face to face – if you are not audible speak loudly. Actually, instead of blaming the people that they are not ‘mobile-literate’ we should blame ourselves – the designers and developers who develop these technologies, which give not much of an idea of how they work to the people who use it and which are not tuned to the people’s everyday environment of use, like other objects.


There was this other instance when I was trying to design a sandwich cart for a street side vendor, when I came across some very interesting facts of their daily life. Each sandwich vendor had an impression that if they can give out an ‘image of selling clean and hygienic food’ they will attract more people; hence they used braded butter and breads (which were used also as an advertising element). Also, their carts, were ‘designed’ and constructed in an ecosystem, which involved the vendor himself, the local carpenter or plumber and the policeman (with the policemen raiding these units every other month, the unit was dirt cheap made of recycled wood from carton boxes, so that they can keep making such stalls). These facts clearly reflect the notion that we human beings are driven by an inherent (meaning which is not taught) sense of enhancing our lives with whatever resources given at hand – ‘jugaadu’.

These observations and some more lead my mind to ponder some very fundamental questions. The first being, are we (the designers, developers, managers, manufacturers) missing the boat and are on wrong side of the bank? When the ‘user’ of the various products that we are going to produce is a productive and resourceful human being, are we considering this fact and exploiting it in the designs? Are we ready to accept that the ‘user’ here is not what we deduce from the ‘requirement gathering’ and ‘user study’ phase but a much more complex person going about her daily life in a very resourceful manner? I feel yes, we have missed the boat and are on the wrong side of a flooded river! The myriad products and gadgets which are heralded by the press as ‘something which will change the way we live’ and which don’t even take off from their research labs, are a testimony to the fact that we are missing something fundamental. And there is something we need to understand in why some of the other products and artifacts have been highly successful in doing so, without that being the intent of the designers or developers – like the internet or the sms!

Well these questions and the one mentioned in my research motivations are what I am going to attempt to answer. The first thing would of course be to see if anyone has been asking some similar questions and what answers they have found. Well, there are some real good people doing this and soon I will follow up this piece with some of my insights into what others have been doing with the same question.

I will also keep putting up some more interesting observations that I have come across or will come across regarding the day to day life of human beings.


12 comments:

shreyank said...

interesting naveen........... really interesting... as i have followed ur ways of looking at things since ur thesis while at git... or ur observation about the utilitarian balconies... and now this interesting keen observation... i have always appreciated ur observations... well firstly...

speaking of the mobile phones...(and hence the users) these companies are money making machines... which are run not to fail. (u know it better..) they know their target...they focus on them... and they gain...and for them the game ends there... in this case the t.v and print media have gained a lot of attention and popularity even in the remotest of the villages of this nation. the companies are ofcourse aware... but thats not their hotspot... hence the villagers...the vendors... or put in totality the illiterate bunch fall in the case of curious bi-passers who happened to get caught in the gloss and glitter and got lost in the magic...

of course ur observation is highly content full... and if worked at will surely lead to something miraculous in the field of industrial design and marketing...

referring to the tittle of the blog... i believe that we (the designers,etc) are neither on the wrong boat nor are we on the other side of the bank... we are just simply on a ship that follows the shortest distance... what is referred to as "mean".

i think the question should be... "is it time now to catch the other boat?" and as per your observations... i guess it is HIGH TIME "we" caught up with the other boat... and better be at the right side of the bank...

actually naveen... something struck me right now... why not make a phone targeted specifically to such people...not just another cheap phone with simple functions and all.. but a phone designed specifically for the "illiterate" bunch... say something like a complete graphical phone... with no text at all... or a phone that reads out the text for them... to avoid the high intensity of screaming pitches provide them with noise cancelation facility.... or may be... direct video calls...may be change the entire face of mobile communication... texts are read out... people can be seen on the phone... or a phone that can fit in their regular outfit...

u knw what i mean... (of course u must have come far better ideas... but... i'm just sharing my enthu... ;) so basically we need not wait for an iphone to come to india... u knw... we got our users we got our issues... lets focus on them and give these people a style statement that mends with them... flows with them... (may be a mobile phone that has a emergency call directed to the local clinic... (lol... u never know...actually the emergency can be used for real...)

nways/... pour in some more water... seems interesting... i'm liking the feel of it...

uRban nOmaD said...

@yanki : quickest of corrections.......

Shortest distance is "displacement"
.. he he..

shreyank said...

anna!!! lol... uff... i hate to drift from the topic.. but according to physics i remem... displacement is just a simple act of an object moving from one position to other... nways... what's ur take on his questions?... interesting post though.. right?

Naveen said...

Shreyank,
some great ideas... and some good questions.. will pour more water on that in detail when i have some time tomorrow... A paper has to be submitted by early morning tomorrow and hence I am off this till then. U folks enjoy...

shreyank said...

all the best... !!!

Naveen said...

Well, though my observations are more related to rural India, the question that is raised is more global. Its not just about designing for the semi literate people or the rural people of India, but I am questioning the way recent objects, technologies in particular, architecture and spaces in general, have been designed and developed. Its also not just about the 'ideas' but more about the whole outlook of the process of design - the outlook where the designer or the manufacturer is supposed to be in total control of the stuff that is being made. Due to this control, the object that is designed is modeled in a typical way to be used and made a meaning out of. This doesn't allow the people using this object to use it in their own way and make their own meaning. Even in the case of 'designing for India', Nokia has done some work in this and put in a lot of effort and money in RnD for indian market - and they are reaping benefits. One of their 'innovation' - the LED torch in the mobile phone is a testimony to this fact. But then, the way one uses this torch, where, when and how, is largely determined by the 'designers' understanding of this context of use, which sadly is always limiting. Because, that torch is used in varied dynamic contexts which require varied amounts of light and also in various different ways of holding and operating. To restrict the people to just pressing it on and cutting off the light when the keypad gets locked is not taking the full potential of that wonderful idea!

Naveen said...

Even those products which are widely accepted and used are because of the fact that they allow the people to manipulate them the way they want to and make their own meanings. But the sad part is, when that product was designed, the main intent behind that product was not to be such manipulative character, but solving some other obvious problem!
For instance, SMS that we use allows for us to write and send messages in any way that we want to, which is being taken advantage of - sms poll, blank sms, sms advertising, sms language! And each sms is unique in its meaning, which is created by the user and understood by the people who are familiar with that group. But SMS was mostly developed and designed as a text communication protocol between two radio devices and the developers had no idea that it will be such a huge day to day phenomenon that it is today. Hence the question, have we missed the boat?

Naveen said...

Also, looks like more of my examples are technological products, and hence I would be interested to see how this has panned out in Architecture and Urban design... People who have any idea, kindly contribute...

shreyank said...

well... i guess...we'll find a lot of examples in almost every aspect of creations... talking bout architecture... i guess a lot of elements architecture are utilised for purposes they are not intended for... be it stairs, bed, kitchen counters, tables, chairs, foot paths etc,... guess it's a vast wide topic with endless examples... nways....

the other day i was preparing for my case study presentation on the "fort precinct-mumbai" there was an interesting point about the issue of "bazaars"

it talks about how the patterns of bazaars tkae over the zones and change the face of the locality for ever... sometimes almost ignoring the appreciation value of the precinct....like the one that have taken over the arcades across the fort area... adn sell what?.... chappals, t-shirts, and cds.,... well the arcades were a climatic response which in-turn becam the identity of the place... and now because of the bazaars there's a new function to it other than just walking... it's added to it a commercial facet... so what was once utilitarian solution has now turned into a life-style "BAZAARCADE" ....

similar patterns can be identified in certain sectors of chandigarh...

actually across many cities... as i said... it's very vast... issue...

i also remem ur presentaion on the utilization of balconies to convert them into offices...(if i remember it correctly...)

Naveen said...

Interesting observations about the intended canopies and archways turning up as bustling street shops. I guess this holds mirror to the fact that what we architects in general believe that we can decide what kind of activities take place and what meanings are generated through our construction of a physical 3 dimensional space, is mostly non- working. I had an opportunity to attend a seminar, a workshop and some chats with Liz Sanders ( www.maketools.com ), who is working with lot of architects to deal with this question. I will write a separate post on why even architecture is in similar situation as other design disciplines... Hope I do it soon :-)

Naveen said...

And I should have added this before, the example of SMS, I had first read it in Bill Buxtons book "Sketching User Experiences". Bill Buxton( www.billbuxton.com ) is the Principal Researcher at Microsoft Research and I feel that book should be part of the library of every design school including architecture schools.

uRban nOmaD said...

Bill Buxton's book....

http://rapidshare.com/files/171093215/sue.rar